Friday, January 16, 2004
Another typical US army story...
All from TFT.
On Friday 2nd January, American soldiers arrested three Iraqi
journalists who were covering the aftermath of a US helicopter
crash for Reuters. The journalists were filming a checkpoint
close to where the helicopter was shot down, near the town of
Falluja, when US soldiers opened fire on them. Then, when the
journalists - all of whom had the word 'PRESS' screaming across
their flak jackets - fled for their lives in their car, they were
arrested. 72 hours later they were released.
This week, courtesy of a formal complaint made by Reuters against
the US soldiers responsible, we have a much clearer idea of what
exactly happened during the journalists' short detention. We know
now that they were tortured. No-one seems to want to use the word
'torture', which is odd, as it really is the only word that
accurately describes what happened. Particularly when used
alongside the word 'gratuitous'.
The words used by Reuters include: 'brutalised', 'intimidated'
and 'terrified'. Semantics. Here's what the US army did to three
innocent people for no good reason:
- they arrested them
- they put bags over their heads
- they threatened them with Guantanamo Bay
- they threatened them sexually, whispering at one stage, 'let's
have sex'; at another, 'If you don't shut up we'll fuck you.'
(Granted this may not have had a sexual connotation, but it's
still not cricket.)
- they made them stand for hours with their arms raised and palms
pressed flat against the wall
Also, one of them was allegedly ordered to strip naked and then
had a shoe shoved in his mouth. According to his nephew: 'He
protested that he was a journalist but they stuck a shoe in his
mouth anyway. They also hurt his leg.'
Two US soldiers have since sworn that they were initially
reacting to being shot at by the journalists - who, naturally,
were unarmed - and General Charles Swannack, commander of the
82nd Airborne Division, has officially stood by them. 'More often
than not they are right,' he said. It's worth remembering that,
more often or not, Ian Huntley didn't murder two girls in his
bathroom, burn their remains and bury them in a ditch.
Meanwhile, Simon Walker, a spokesman for Reuters, has expressed
hope that the complaint 'will be dealt with expeditiously'. Well,
he'll get nowhere with sophisticated language like that. He would
do well to remember that he is dealing with professional thugs
here. Extremely focused thugs who know where they want to go, but
are not intelligent enough to get there. Idiots, in the end, who
fail to see how hiring children and hillbillies to create
legitimacy and harmony where there is decidedly none to be found,
will inevitably result in situations such as these.
And repeatedly covering it all up is only making things worse.
Incidentally, the only other response from the US military, at
the time of writing, has been to tell Reuters, point-blank, to
'drop it'.